Anne-Marie Delcambre invited to the program "Food for thought" on France Culture on November 16.
Anne-Marie Delcambre ad SANParks.org Forums:
The issue of France-Culture "Food for thought", where I am going to speak next Monday between 6:20 p.m. ET 19h:
stakeholders as it would for
Presentation: The director of "Books" because of his record "The Riddle of the Koran."
1) Mahmud Hussein (actually 2 men)
"Mahmoud Hussein" is the pseudonym of two authors: Baghgat Elnadi (b. 1936) and Adel Rifaat (b. 1938). Both Egyptians - one is of Muslim origin, the other Jewish, but converted to Islam - they were at the time of Nasser's outspoken secularists and Marxists. In this capacity they were detained several times in the 1960s before moving to France, where they were naturalized in 1983. They hold a PhD in political philosophy, and author of many books among which include: South side of liberty, Essay on the emergence of the individual in the Third World, Arabs at present; on Bonaparte's expedition to Egypt. Between 1978 and 1988, "the" Mahmoud Hussein led the Unesco Courier, published in 30 languages and distributed in 120 countries.
They have already published by Grasset, Volume I of "Al Sira" (13,000 copies sold to date).
2) by telephone In-Muhammad Naji, a professor in Rabat, Morocco interviewed since
3) And I
Topic: The Way of exegesis is she open? "
Summary of issue :
LIES ON THE INTERPRETATION OF ISLAM
The debate
Delcambre - Hussein - Ennaji as it was presented by Brice Couturier was highly distorted from the outset, more Anne-Marie Delcambre could not speak except for a few minutes ...
theme, exegesis the Koran, was immediately distorted by the presentation through a chronology of scholars, without any mention of the field, purpose, and reception of such exegesis. In other words Brice Couturier announced that the interpretation of the Koran is possible and scalable. At the end of the show for that matter, his colleague said that the debate that would close in 30 years (!) ... Anne-Marie Delcambre
tried it to focus on the content of the text and what he said himself on his understanding (Quran 3 / 7). Only his opponent immediately found a way that can work to an audience who does not know Islam: he complained to Anne-Marie Delcambre quote the text, based on the texts, saying she was "like the Islamists ATMs Materials.
is a ridiculous argument, of course: because obviously, if the texts were not there and were not what they are, it would be much easier to make them say the opposite of what they say, obviously without the Koran, the Sunna and Sira, it would be much easier for intellectuals to "find an Islam lights, recess if the 40 Hadiths of Nawani were not on sale in Islamic bookstores and even public libraries in the whole cell radius by Islam, it would be much easier for these intellectuals to convince non-Muslims as Muslims that "Islam" can rhyme with "Enlightenment" as "Christianity" with "love" ...
observe in passing that person in the world right-thinking ventures to make Islam not just rhyme with "Lights" but with "love" and for good reason: if one finds among the Enlightenment philosophers of the same abuse that the Koran against some religions and some people, it would be hard to link the word "love" to Islam because it is not once in the Koran, the word Jerusalem, for that matter.
When Anne-Marie Delcambre said the closure is in the texts themselves and talk about their legal nature, it has unfortunately not enough time to explain. She did not have time to explain it Islam is in the rules of interpretation and a hierarchy of sources, as in straight, with first the Koran, the Sunna second, etc., and therefore, complain of "Islamists" to refer to verses Quran is a blatant lie about the content of texts and Islamic history, history in which all the "exegesis" and "ijtihad" in fact exercised by the ulama, have been taken from the texts themselves ourselves and not outside of these texts. From
exegesis 'Islamists' make and unlike what one has, are advocates against supporters of a reduction in the case of a "taqlid" (an imitation of previous judicial decisions), which would make sharia unadaptable realities of life today. The Islamists want them reading of Islam shows that it is applicable here and now the whole world and modern realities, they will not settle for a reduced reading to matters dealt with by lawyers country long remained independent but economically backward area or left by the colonizers to cadis whose power was confined to matters of "personal . No, they want to "Islamization of modernity, modernity to comply with sharia, the way of God, addressing all the issues, reviewing all the arguments, but always, absolutely always based on texts from" Allah and his prophet. " So this
ijtihad (which the authors call such "reformist" Muslims living writing for this relatively new phenomenon of Islamic minority, and Europe), not based on any philosophical reading fantasy and poetic texts, but, on the texts themselves and their logical reading a rigorous logic of Jurists. A Reading can be creative, but limited points from the "facts" of reality of current practice, but never against the clear logic of texts, because this would be pure blasphemy. It is also primarily a scholarly reading of texts, a reading by lawyers who not only know the Koran by heart almost, but also thoughts and comments of their predecessors, and all matters of principle and practice that 'they have already solved. The opposite of rantings of "new Muslim philosophers" devoid of any reference to this thought, as indeed their opponents nicknames which all knowledge can be summarized by reading their books apologetic.
Knowing this, we see that the idea of a moratorium on stoning of Tariq Ramadan is a "non-blameworthy innovation" because it conforms to the rule that is applied in Islam taking into account its ultimate goal, namely that the law of Allah reigns over the world, and therefore, the proposal of Ramadan is entirely consistent with the duty of Muslims to break down barriers to Islam, the number which are the horror stoning among non-Muslims. Tariq Ramadan not said anything contrary to his brother, who explains that stoning purified, Tariq Ramadan, only requests from scholars consider the time factor to accustom the Western idea ...
scholarly reading of Islam and is therefore remained bounded and limited by the plain meaning of certain orders of Allah, and reports highlighted by scholars over the centuries between the texts (Qur'an, sunna, sira, context of the descent of verses ...) that give precise meaning to the orders, prohibitions, recommendations and blame those supposed to be god and his way (Shariah).
Now these orders contain and still contain the "unequivocal verses" advocating the subjugation or killing non-Muslims, women and apostates.
is why we must denounce Islam for the good of everyone, including Muslims.
Elisseievna.
November 2009.
Path of Qur'anic exegesis is she open?
issue of Monday, November 16, 2009 in partnership with the magazine Books
Anne-Marie Delcambre. Lawyer, Islamist, Professor of Arabic literary
Olivier Postel-Vinay. Managing editor and the publication of books by phone Ennaji
Mohammed of Morocco. Professor at the University Mohammed V in Rabat
Mahmoud Hussein (pseudonym of two authors). Political scientists
http://www.libertyvox.com/files/FranceCulture_AnneMarieDelcambre_PostelVinay_Ennaji_Hussein_ExegeseCoranique_GrainAMoudre_091116.mp3
Sura 3 verse 7: 'It is He Who sent down to thee the Book: Therein is unequivocal verses, which are the basis of the Book, and other verses that can lead to various interpretations. People, therefore, who have at heart a perversity, emphasize is allegorical, seeking discord, trying to find their meanings, but that no one knows its hidden meanings except Allah. But those firmly grounded in knowledge say: "We believe: anything is from our Lord!" But only men of understanding remember that. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment